More Parks?

I was particularly interested in the reading about Jane Jacobs and her book written in the 1960s questioning established practices in urban planning. Even in class we have been assuming that green spaces and parks revitalize an urban neighborhood and provide safe spaces for women and children. Jacobs questions and even proves that this is often not the case with many accepted practices. Narrow, crowded neighborhood streets area often better places for children to play as they are safer because of neighbors’ ability to watch from their windows. An intricate “street ballet” occurs in these heavily populated areas that is beneficial to its residents for the interpersonal relationships it establishes.

From my own observations, I haven’t been particularly impressed with the park only a few hundred feet from my apartment. Maybe it is because of the recent murder of a young woman by an attacker on King Street, but I don’t feel particularly safe alone in this park. It seems to be more of a refuge for the homeless than for children. I mentioned this in my observations this week as well. Perhaps, for myself, it is the “perception of crime” that hinders my use more than actual crime. I found this brief paragraph about this.

“However, there is a difference between actual crime statistics in a park and the perception of crime in a protected area. People’s perception of crime in the Heart of the City can be distorted by old information, ignorance of the facts, racism, or other influences. Perception of crime is typically identified as the most significant concern that prevents outsiders from visiting the Heart of the City and from using the open space resources in the area, particularly Franklin Park. Actual crime statistics in Heart of the City parks reflect that the parks are as safe or safer than those in other neighborhoods of Boston and that crime incidences have plummeted since the 1970s.”

Overall, I’m more creating an opposing viewpoint than arguing that parks are unnecessary or always unsafe. A park cannot just exist as an open space, it must be well kempt, highly visible, and perceived as safe.

This entry was posted in Blog. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to More Parks?

  1. Andrea Roberts says:

    Kelsey:
    This is a great post. I think that you might want to Google something called the broken windows thory. It relates to your musings on perceptions of safety in public spaces. You can get a quick overview of this concept in Malcolm Gladwell’s “The Tipping Point.”

  2. You’re choice to use Jane Jacobs in this post was a fantastic way to support your argument. Jane (because her and I are so close) is very clear about how even intelligently design space produce unintended side effects (good or bad). I think I know which park you are talking about and it does have a very uncomfortable perception attached to it. Planners and designers don’t often think about what a park does for a community at night. Great post!

Comments are closed.